For the Record - August 5, 2009

I think this picture cuts right to the heart of what I'm about to say. Now, for the record, I'm just thinking out loud here. I am no one of any great importance but for that very reason I am the voice of the common man, the voice on the street if you will. To paraphrase Bob Marley, only the people on the bottom, those without a lot of earthly possessions to distract them from reality, really know what's going on and are therefore legitimately connected to the pulse of the people. Now, I've noticed something lately that I'd like to share with those of you who care to read such things. Granted, most everyone who listened to music in high school thought that their particular era was by far and away the best age in music and it all went downhill from there. But, and here's the rub, just what if because of a lot of reasons ranging from pre-corporate take over of most of the radio station programming to the saturation of the market via the internet, you really were in a position to witness the last death rattle of good music available to the masses. What if it really did all go downhill from when you were considered the ideal Mtv demographic? Can anyone argue that music has evolved right along with the corporate creature feature it's become in the last few years? Oh, I think not. And here's exhibit B: In case you weren't aware of this, they cut out most art and music programs from the general educational curriculum in grade schools quite some time ago. Therefore, there's this whole younger generation coming up that weren't really exposed to music in their formative years. Imagine the caliber of something like professional tennis if kids didn't take up the sport until high school...You see where I'm headed with this? Now this generation has graduated from the amateur ranks and gone pro. So what kind of music are they playing? With an entire century's worth of recorded music to draw from, where did they look to for inspirado? The most soulless form of music ever known to man and womankind...80's music. And why would they be gravitating towards the ebonics equivalent of music? It's not because of how hard it rocks, yeah pretty sure about that. It's as simple as this: It is E-A-SY to play, especially if you've been playing your instrument for all of 3 years. Watch any of the new groups playing on the Tonight Show, or Carson Daly-the bass players are all playing the same Kim Deal Pixies bass line. And who's the Stevie Ray Vaughn, guitar hero of this gen
eration? This guy...
Now here's where my theory turns a corner. Stay with me here, I'm going somewhere with all of this. A while back I had what alcoholics would refer to as a moment of epiphany while listening to this old 80's tune that I have a fond association with by Echo & the Bunnymen. Now, the song is just what it is, but listening to the lyrics with a fresh set of ears I realized that this song is a very, very thinly veiled ode to cocaine. It's all right there, plain to hear for anyone with a set of ears, but in the sixth grade I hadn't yet connected those dots with the white chalked up lines so-to-speak. That's when the flash of lightening went off: Most, if not all of the 80's music was written, performed and from what I'm told by extremely solid sources that lived through it, unofficially sponsored by cocaine. Not exactly something that anyone over the age of ten couldn't put together on their own I know, I know. Now I hate to admit it, but there was some real music made with soul and genuine passion in that time period. It's pretty few and far between good solid albums during those ten years, but it's there if you look really really hard. You ever look at the pictures of the great Miles Davis in the 80's?

Not exactly the pictures that Columbia Records wants you to remember as the definitive images of a musical icon. Evidence that even the solid artists that had been stellar in other eras had a rough go of things there in Miami Vice years. And here we are again, a good 19 years later and they're back like a tumor. Usually when something goes around, it comes back in a slightly more stylish if not practical kind of way. Say for example, bell bottoms-the next time around they weren't made with a lot of baby blue polyester for a very good reason. But the 1982 revival of late doesn't seem to have made much headway in improving what was a very ugly fashion sensibility the first time around. Am I wrong? And how does a revamped musical style get worse unless it's made by lesser musicians doing their rendition of live karaoke? I'll tell you how! I think it's because they aren't properly inspired. Now, I'm with Nancy on just saying no (most of time), but I think if these kids did their homework they'd invest in a little Colombian nose candy, put on their INXS albums, and get it right, at least the important musical side of it.



